CDFW Moves Notifications for Lake and Streambed Alteration Standard Agreements Online

Last month, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) issued notice that it will begin accepting electronic notifications for all Lake and Streambed Alteration Standard Agreements (Cal. Fish & Game Code § 1600 et seq.) effective August 1, 2020.  This move to online applications is part of a broader effort by CDFW to go paperless.

CDFW will accept notifications for Standard Agreements through its new online Environmental Permit Information Management System (“EPIMS”).  CDFW will continue to accept paper notifications through August 2020, but all applications received on or after September 1, 2020 will be processed via EPIMS.  CDFW believes that using EPIMS will streamline the permitting process and make it more efficient by providing access anywhere internet is available, for submittal of supplemental information, calculation of permit fees, electronic signatures, automated email alerts and reminders, and applicant tracking of permit progress.

CDFW will continue to accept paper notifications for other agreement types, such as Master, Gravel/Sand/Rock Extraction, Routine Maintenance, and Timber Harvesting) until further notice.

How California’s Oil Industry May Help Preserve Agriculture in California’s Southern San Joaquin Valley – Recycled, Oil Field Produced Water Found Safe for Crop Irrigation

A study conducted by researchers at Duke University and RTI International found that reusing oil field produced water that has been mixed with surface water to irrigate crops in Kern County’s Cawelo Water District does not pose any major health risks. To cope with droughts and water shortages, some farmers in the Cawelo district have used diluted produced water to irrigate their crops for over two decades. Though the diluted produced water does contain slightly elevated levels of salts and boron as compared to the local groundwater, those levels are below applicable state standards for drinking and irrigation water. Avner Vengosh, professor of water quality and geochemistry at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment, stated that the study “did not find any major water quality issues, nor metals and radioactivity accumulation in soil and crops that might cause health concerns.”

California’s own groundwater regulatory agency is on the brink of coming to the same conclusion. For nearly five years, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (“Regional Board”) has been conducting its own investigation into the safety of using produced water to irrigate crops. As part of this effort, the Regional Board assembled a Food Safety Expert Panel, which commissioned various, wide-ranging studies. Regional Board Chair Karl Longley stated that the findings from these studies showed no red flags in crops grown with the recycled produced water. Regional Board staff is currently preparing a white paper summarizing the Food Safety Expert Panel’s findings and recommendations. We are monitoring the Regional Board’s work and will report on its conclusions in future posts.

Supreme Court Holds Clean Water Act Permit Required for Some Discharges to Groundwater

Last Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) requires a permit to discharge pollutants that reach “navigable waters” through groundwater, but only if the discharge is the “functional equivalent of a direct discharge” to the navigable water.1 In reaching this decision, the Court took the middle ground. It rejected both the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation that the CWA requires a source to obtain a permit whenever pollutants found in a navigable water are “fairly traceable” to that source, and arguments by Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and others that a permit is never required for discharges of pollutants that reach a navigable water through groundwater. Continue Reading

U.S. Supreme Court Holds that CERCLA Does Not Block State Law Claims Seeking Restoration, Subject to EPA Approval

In a split decision in which Chief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion, the United States Supreme Court held yesterday in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian that the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) does not bar a plaintiff’s ability to bring state law claims in state court for property damage, such as nuisance and trespass claims, that do not arise under CERCLA.  The Supreme Court further held that plaintiffs can bring restoration claims against potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) for remediation beyond what the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) requires under CERCLA, but any additional remedial action must be approved by the agency. Continue Reading

State Water Agencies Expect Water Use Reporting to Continue as Normal as California Shelters in Place

On March 19, 2020, California issued Executive Order N-25-20, a statewide shelter in place order in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, significantly altering operations of both state agencies and private businesses.  However, California’s water regulators, including the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, and the Department of Water Resources (DWR), have committed to maintaining critical deadlines, compliance requirements, and agency operations in the interest of public health and safety.

Importantly, the SWRCB’s Division of Water Rights continues to require all surface water users to submit annual reports to meet the April 1, 2020 deadline for reporting 2019 water use.  As of the publication of this alert, although the Division of Water Rights has postponed non-essential file review, the Division of Water Rights is maintaining limited hours to view essential records, by appointment only.

Additionally, the SWRCB and the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (collectively “Water Boards”) issued a guidance statement providing that in the interest of protecting public health, safety, and the environment, timely compliance with all Water Board orders and requirements is required. This includes compliance with regulations, permits, contractual obligations, primacy delegations, and funding conditions that are in effect.

Continue Reading

Reversing 30-Year Policy, U.S. DOJ Says Settlements Can No Longer Include Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs)

This post was co-authored by Beth Ginsberg & Krista McIntyre.

The U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. DOJ) recently issued a memorandum stating that settlements, including consent decrees, entered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other federal agencies can no longer include a Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP), unless the SEP is expressly authorized by Congress. Companies and individuals accused of violating environmental laws and permits, like Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act permits, commonly agree to perform SEPs to fund projects that go beyond compliance instead of paying a higher cash penalty to the U.S. Treasury. Going forward, companies, individuals, and local governments will no longer have SEPs as a settlement option.

To support this policy reversal after more than 30 years, U.S. DOJ cites to the Miscellaneous Receipts Act, which grants only Congress the authority to decide how to appropriate federal funds. The U.S. DOJ views SEPs as federal funds, and, in U.S. DOJ’s opinion, the EPA and other federal agencies lack the authority to divert those funds to third party recipients and to select the projects that should receive the funds. The power of the purse rests squarely with Congress. “[W]ith SEPs, money otherwise destined for the Treasury finds its way to another destination, not at the insistence of Congress, where the Constitution puts that authority, but instead at the insistence of an administrative agency, or a non-federal entity, or some combination thereof.” Continue Reading

Oil & Gas Related Bills Update for the 2019-2020 Legislative Session

Stoel Rives’ Oil & Gas Team has been monitoring bills introduced by California legislators since the beginning of the 2019-2020 Legislative Session.  Below is the latest update on a list of bills, summarized pursuant to the Legislative Counsel’s Digest, that our team has been following and will continue to monitor as the 2019-2020 Legislative Session proceeds.

Please also see our Renewable + Law post summarizing bills related to other energy topics here.

AB 345 (Muratsuchi, D): Natural Resources: Oil and Gas: Regulation of Operations.

STATUS: Last amended March 18, 2019; currently in Senate Appropriations suspense file.

Would require the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to create an environmental justice program within the agency to identify and address any gaps in existing programs, policies, or activities that may impede the achievement of environmental justice. The bill, contingent upon funding for this purpose, would require the secretary to establish a grant-based reimbursement program to enable environmental justice and community groups to meaningfully participate in rulemaking and other regulatory processes at departments and entities within the agency.

Continue Reading

SWRCB Releases Draft Implementation Guidance Regarding the Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material

On February 14, 2020, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) published Draft Guidance for the State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State (Draft Guidance). The Draft Guidance pertains to the SWRCB’s adoption of a State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State (Procedures) that were approved by the California Office of Administrative Law (OAL) on August 29, 2019.

The Procedures, formerly known as the Wetland Riparian Area Protection Policy, apply to all discharges of dredged or fill material to waters of the state, not just wetlands. The Procedures consist of four major elements: 1) definition of a wetland; 2) a framework for determining if a feature that meets the wetland definition is a water of the state; 3) wetland delineation procedures; and 4) procedures for the submittal, review and approval of applications for Water Quality Certifications and Waste Discharge Requirements for dredge or fill activities. The Procedures will become effective on May 28, 2020.

The goal of the Draft Guidance is to provide applicants with general guidance in preparing application materials for a dredge or fill project. While the Draft Guidance does not address all possible topics related to implementation of the Procedures, the topics covered reflect the most common requests from stakeholders.

The SWRCB will hold public workshops and trainings throughout California to discuss and receive feedback on the Draft Guidance, the first of which is scheduled for February 28, 2020 from 9:00am – 12:00pm at CalEPA Headquarters in Sacramento:

CalEPA Headquarters – Sierra Hearing Room, 2nd Floor
1001 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814

Written comments on the Draft Guidance are due by March 13, 2020, as outlined here.

Between April 22, 2020 and May 20, 2020 – after the Draft Guidance is finalized but before the May 28, 2020 effective date of the Procedures – SWRCB and Regional Water Quality Control Board staff will also hold additional public trainings throughout California regarding the Procedures. After each training session, staff will be available to answer questions. A detailed schedule for the public trainings is available at
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/cwa401/docs/dredge_fill/notice_dredgeguidance.pdf

For more information on the Procedures, the Draft Guidance, or public workshops and trainings, please see https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/cwa401/wrapp.html.

DTSC and SWRCB Release Draft Supplemental Vapor Intrusion Guidance

On February 14, 2020, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) issued a public notice regarding the release of Draft Supplemental Guidance: Screening and Evaluating Vapor Intrusion (Draft Guidance) that  supplements existing vapor intrusion guidance issued in 2011.  The Draft Guidance is now available for public review and comment.  Comments are due by 12:00pm on April 30, 2020. Continue Reading

CalGEM’s Public Health Rulemaking Workshops

The California Geologic Energy Management Division (“CalGEM”), formerly known as the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (“DOGGR”), is actively working on revising its regulations to better align its regulatory mandates with the new goals of Assembly Bill 1057, which requires CalGEM to focus on protecting public health and the environment, and less on efficient and effective oil and gas production. The scope and extent of these regulatory changes may have far-reaching consequences for the oil and gas industry in California. As part of its pre-rulemaking process, CalGEM is hosting community workshops and accepting public comments regarding its proposed regulatory changes.

I.      WHY IS CALGEM HOSTING WORKSHOPS?

While CalGEM’s materials on its pre-rulemaking process do not explain the exact nature or effect of these workshops, CalGEM’s workshops align with its new focus and November 2019 announcement of new oil and gas initiatives.  Effective January 1, 2020, Assembly Bill 1057 changed DOGGR’s name to CalGEM and updated CalGEM’s focus from development and production of petroleum resources to transitioning to a low-carbon future and protecting public health, safety and the environment.  In addition, last November CalGEM released a series of initiatives targeting certain oil and gas extraction methods, intended to safeguard public health and the environment.  The November initiatives include:

  1. Imposing a moratorium on new oil extraction wells that use high-pressure steam to break oil formations below the ground;
  2. Announcing new rules for public health and safety protections near oil and gas extraction facilities would be updated and strengthened; and
  3. Completing an independent audit of CalGEM’s permitting processes for well stimulation and underground injection control and a scientific review of pending well stimulation permits to ensure public health, safety and environmental protections are met prior to approving each permit.

These initiatives are in line with the State of California’s overall climate goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045.  California intends to meet this goal, in part, by decreasing fossil fuel dependence and consumption. Continue Reading

LexBlog